Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

New Years, New Resolutions

January 6, 2012 Leave a comment

Hi there, sports fans!

I know it’s been a very long time since I last posted here, but there have been several things that happened in my real life that prevented further note-taking and posting.


First: My son was born. Mr. Y graced the world with his presence on Shemini Atzeres. 

Second, the Chagim just really threw me for a loop in terms of scheduling time to actually write.

Third, Work got extremely busy! Many nights, I would drag myself home and just crawl into bed. 


Well, Im hoping to make up for lost time and give you guys a regular posting at least once a week of wine education and wine review. There are a plethora of new wines from old regions and new wines from new regions of the kosher world to be opened and tasted, and I’ll make sure that you are aware of each one!



Categories: Uncategorized

On the Passing of Daniel Rogov

September 8, 2011 Leave a comment

As many of you have undoubtedly heard recently, Daniel Rogov, the Robert Parker of Israeli wineries (kosher or otherwise), has passed away. I have read his book s for years, now, and would read his column in Ha’Aretz when I had the opportunity to do so. His passing, while not a shock, is still very sad, as Israel has lost its greatest wine champion.

In his wake a multitude of other wine writers and bloggers (and yes, occasionally the two categories do actually meet!), including yours truly, who carry on his noble work of promoting Israeli wine. While I may have my self-doubt whether anything I write could ever come up to the level, clarity and succinctness of Rogov’s contribution to wine literature, it is my aspiration to reach that level, if not in notoriety, then at least in quality and regularity of contribution.

Mr. Rogov, while I never had the opportunity to meet you, you still had an impact on my life and career as a wine blogger, a wine drinker and Israeli-phile in general. You will be sorely missed. My wine this Shabbos will be in your honor, whatever it ends up being (I have yet to make my selection!)

For those of you who have read this and other posts on my blog, I do welcome comments directly on the blog, or if you would rather send me those comments, questions, etc., you can email me directly at My goal is to educate people about not only the way a given wine smells and tastes, but also why it does that.  And if you are interested in learning more about the intricacies of the wine production process, I welcome questions, comments, concerns and do use the feedback to make choices about what I put into my future posts. But I digress.

My hope is that all of this can honor in some small way, the memory of a man, without whom Israeli wine would largely be relegated to the kosher-only market or for local consumption. And if by chance one of his family stumbles across my meager postings, my sympathies are with you and yours. Daniel Rogov was a true inspiration to me and my wine life. May HaShem comfort you among the mourners of Zion and Jerusalem.

Balma Venitia Muscat de Beaumes de Venise 2006

September 6, 2011 Leave a comment

Today’s wine is a French dessert wine called Muscat de Beaumes de Venise. Yes, that’s right. I’m writing about a muscat wine. But this is quite different than te infamous blue bottle Bartenura Moscato.

Beaumes de Venise is a French AOC (remember those designations?) in the southern Rhône Valley. This region makes both a dry red and the Muscat Beaumes de Venise, which is our topic for today. This region has a history going back at least 2000 years, as Pliny the Elder mentioned the muscat grape being cultivated here.

So, geography aside, what makes this Muscat different from all other Muscats, you ask? For one, the Beaumes is NOT sparkling. For another, to get the AOC designation, the wine must be fortified.

Fortifying a wine means that a spirit alcohol, in this case being a minimum of 95% alcohol, is added to the fermenting juice. what this does is shoot the alcohol percentage to a level that kills off the yeast (ironically, even though yeasts create alcohol, if the concentration of alcohol passes a certain level, yeasts die. They die of their own byproducts!), while still maintaining a sweet wine. Historically Beaumes wines have also been allowed to have the words “vin doux naturel” on the label, meaning naturally sweet wine. By law, Muscat Beaumes de Venise must be at least 15% alcohol, so this is not your grandma’s muscat wine!

The upshot from all this processing? First, the wine has some serious aging potential (today’s subject comes from the 2006 vintage, and probably can hang on for a few more years!), and also, for whatever reason, Beaumes has a tendency to have a bitter finish. I asked others about the bitterness and they said that it wasn’t endemic to this  product, but rather the nature of the beast when dealing with Muscat Beaumes de Venise.

So the first thing I noticed when I smelled the wine was the orange blossoms were very apparent. Orange blossom, you say? Yes, orange blossom. It’s more delicate than a full-on orange and also there are some floral undertones, hence orange blossom. I also caught a hint of flinty mineral (from the soil it grows in) and a very viscous quality about the wine as I swirled it around in my glass (to be expected, given the level of sugar and alcohol in the wine!)

The orangey flavors were very strong when I finally sipped the wine, along with the minerally notes I mentioned earlier and that oddly bitter finish. Because of that bitterness, I wouldn’t drink this solo, but rather as part of a dessert pairing, such as a fruit salad with very ripe fruits or a trifle, if you’re from the South. (If you don’t know what a trifle is, think parfait with cake on a massive scale). You want to pick a dessert that is sweeter than the wine to mask the bitterness therein, also if you don’t, then the dessert will not taste sweet at all.

Tabor Adama Merlot, 2008

August 25, 2011 Leave a comment

Merlot has a certain….reputation, thanks to films like Sideways, where Paul Giamatti‘s character goes into a rampage after being offered Merlot. Generally, most of the anti-Merlot contingent stake the claim that Merlot is an overly soft, unstructured and uninteresting wine. And they are largely correct.

Merlot is a generally soft and plummy grape which, in the right hands, can actually make a delightful and interesting wine (see wines from Pomerol and St. Emilion as classic examples of Merlot done right). However, California-style winemakers have developed a tendency to allow Merlot to overripen on the vine and thus overbalance the resulting wine on the side of fruit, at the expense of tannin, acid and overall complexity.

Now, the bright side to these wines is that they are very friendly to the neophyte in the wine world. Because these wines are so fruity and low in acid and tannin, they make for fun and easy wines to drink without forcing the drinker to delve into the wine and unlock its complexities (because it has little). The down side of this is that they make for easy wines to drink without forcing the drinker to delve into the wine and unlock its complexities (because it has little).

So, in generaly, I will recommend a Merlot when someone is interested in learning about the basics of wine and is not “ready” for the heavy-duty wines like what you see in Bordeaux or Barolo or other areas of California. Merlot is an inexpensive (usually) and basic (usually) wine that will likely appeal to anyone’s palate, regardless of their wine knowledge or lack thereof.

All that being said, these qualities of Merlot, particularly in its Californian iterations, is a double-edged sword. Because of its reputation as a mild and fruity wine without a lot of complexity, many wine geeks will turn their nose at an offering of Merlot because of the Californian practice of over-ripening the fruit so that the resulting wine is uber-fruity and soft and full-bodied (longer ripening = more sugar = more alcohol = more body). But this lack of complexity and interest-driving wine makes for a bad reputation, thus Paul Giamatti’s subsequent outburst on film.

Now to today’s subject: Tabor Adama Merlot. This is an Israeli Merlot from Tabor winery, which has often been held in high regard for its quality New World style wines. The Adama line is their mid-range line of wines, encompassing several varietals, including today’s Merlot.

This is one wine, sadly, that Paul Giamatti would again rail against. Full-bodied and relatively low in tannin and acid. The plush plummy fruits run wild without the requisite structure to keep the wine interesting and food friendly. I keep trying Merlots with the hopes of finding some truly nice ones that break this long-held trend of flabby California-style wine, but this is not one of them. Particularly disappointing is the price tag: $25-30.

Now, where does this wine have merit? It is a well-known label and because of its soft, plummy qualities, is very popular among those that like very fruity wines. The label is attractive as well, making for a nice gift.

My thoughts on a rose wine.

August 14, 2011 Leave a comment

It’s time to think pink! The Galil Mountain Winery puts out a rose each year and I find it to be a great value in the world of rose. But what exactly is rose wine? It ain’t White Zinfandel, any more, Toto!

Ok, so maybe I overspoke a minute ago. White Zinfandel is technically a rose wine, but in terms of the popular rose style, it is a very different style from the norm. But I digress…

Rose wines are, like the name suggests, a pink-hued wine that is nether red nor white, but shares aspects of both at the same time. Almost all grapes give off white juice when pressed (there are a handful of exceptions like the Concord grape); what makes red wine red, then, is contact with red grape skins. So, to differentiate a red wine from a rose, all you need to do is limit the time that the fermenting juice has in contact with the red grape skins.

There are multiple ways to make a wine “rose.” The first method is called the “sanginee” method, whereby you “bleed off” some of the fermenting juice so that the remaining juice can have a stronger interaction with the red skins (thus getting “more” red). The rose wine is a happy byproduct of this method.

The second method is to literally remove the grape skins from the vat of juice after a given period of time (sometimes as little as a couple of hours!). In this case, the entire vat is intended for use as rose wine. There is a third method, though rarely used, of blending white and red wine so that your final product is pink; the problem with this method is that it usually gives you an inferior product.

Stylistically, rose wines have fill a variety of niches, from light to full-bodied, from fruity to herbaceous. But they usually have a common theme of being higher in acidity, to varying degrees. In Provence, home to some of the world’s most coveted rose wines, they tend to lean towards light-bodied, very tart wines. This gives you a similar effect that lemonade would give you in the middle of the summer: cooling, refreshing and all-in-all delicious.

For the most part, rose wines are not age-worthy items (a notable, albeit non-kosher, exception is the Rioja house Marques de Heredia, which tends to age their roses for upwards of a decade before releasing them! And they are still delicious).  Usually, you will want to find roses that are of the current vintage (the previous year). Occasionally you might be able to find a rose from the Southern hemisphere from the current year because they harvest and vinify their products in February – April.

The particular wine I am discussing today exhibits this last point all too well. The Galil Mountain rose, 2009. Galil Mountain is a cooperative project between Kibbutz Yiron and the Golan Heights Winery (of Yarden fame, see my post on their Odem Chardonnay). By and large, I have been impressed with the Galil Mountain line of products as being good for the price.

However, the 2009 rose, which I tasted in 2011, fell short. I don’t think that this was any fault of the winery or the winemaking process, but rather, that this wine had outlived its better time. See, there’s a common misconception that all wines continue to improve with age. This maxim is only true for a handful of wines nowadays and even then, after a certain point, even these wines will begin to degrade; the tannins and acid disappear from the wine, the flavors tend to be more muted and the wine is just generally uninteresting.

To put it in terms of a human development span, a baby can’t do as much (and thus “not matured”_ as a toddler, who can’t do as much as a child who is not as matured as a teenager to young adult to middle age to “the golden years” to old age and finally death. Somewhere along that path of development (and this point is different for every individual), any given person is considered “over the hill” and is unable to do as much as he/she was able to do previously.

Perhaps this last analogy was a bit coarse, but all the same the effect is there. All of this falls true for the Galil Mountain 2009 Rose. This was probably a spectacular wine last year, but this year there was no acidic structure, the fruits were not vibrant and the wine just generally tasted inspid. Sad, considering the $18 price tag it’s carrying. I imagine that if I had my hands on the 2010 vintage, that it would have been a very fun and interesting wine.  It’s a prime case of a wine that is past its prime.


En Fuego Tempranillo, Yecla, Spain 2010

July 15, 2011 7 comments

Serious wine has returned to Sefarad!

Spain has a long and rich history of Jewish winemaking that ended in the 15th century when Spanish royalty decided that the Jews needed to either convert of be expelled. Now, after 500 years of exile, Spain is the home to many wonderful kosher wines.

Tempranillo is indigenous to Spain and is the primary grape in one of Spain’s most famous wine regions: Rioja. Since wine is so much about geography, I am starting to add maps with this post and moving backwards as much as possible. Rioja is highlighted in dark purple in the map below. (Source: Wikipedia)

Rioja Wine region

However, today’s wine comes from the unsung region of Yecla in Southern Spain. This region is known more for its Monastrell (a grape we will hopefully experience in a later posting), but in this case is the home to a particularly delicious Tempranillo. (Source: Wikipedia)

Now, many may look at the bottle and ask me why I am writing a glowing review of such a young red wine (let’s face it, it’s been available for less than a year!)? The reality of the situation is that many (and perhaps most) wines are meant to be drunk young. (This is one place where I may go on my soapbox supporing screw cap wines but since our subject today isn’t one with a screw cap, I will forego it for now.) Young wines are very fresh and have high levels of fruit and usually acid (whether naturally from the grape or added during the fermentation and/or aging). While not the most complex wines, young (or joven in Spanish) are not meant to be these massive, serious, pondering wines that could lead one to spend hours unraveling the wine’s complexities.

Instead, young wines are intended to be bright, refreshing and just fun to drink. And En Fuego is no exception! The fruit and spicy notes are the first things I smelled in the wine’s bouquet. Fresh, under-ripe cherries and a little wooden spice (cinnamon? bergamot?) were first and foremost. But while aromatic, not terribly complex.

So what, then, does aging do for a wine (be prepared, this is a long aside)? Aging in a bottle with a cork in it (again, differentiating from a screw cap wine, which will get its own spot in future post) allows for a minute amount of air into the wine bottle, and this allows the wine to resolve its tannins and acid levels, primarily, as well as allow for more complexity from the wine itself, though this is often a secondary effect of the aging process. Aging used to be manditory for most of the premium-quality wines that were made, and only the so-called “jug wine” could be drunk immediately.

The reason for this is that the wines in these cases were so high in acid and tannin (in the case of red wines), that they were not drinkable in their young state. By allowing the wine to age in the cellar these tannins and acids literally fall out of the wine and form crystals on the bottom. Additionally the overly bright and fresh fruity flavors in the wine subside, allowing for older, earthier qualities to come out of the wine. There’s not much in the way of serious age-worthy wine in the kosher world, so I’ll resort to more famous brands in the treife world. The top-growth Bordeaux wines (What’s a “top-growth” you ask? That’s another topic for another post) used to be aged for 10-40 years (or more!) before they were “ready” to be drunk. In fact, you can still find Mouton Rothschild bottles from the early 1960’s that are drinking very well right now.

How did these wines have such high acid and tannin levels and what’s different between then and now? there are two main issues that differentiate wines from today and wines from yesteryear: the time of picking (which man does have some control over) and the overall climate and environment (which we don’t). To tackle the second issue first: I am not suggesting global warming, but the climate has been on a warming trend, particularly over the last 30 or so years. Warmer temperatures increase sugar and decrease acid; lower acid leads partly to less aging potential.

The answer to the first question takes us back a few years to California. California winemakers started to pick their grapes later in the season, creating wines that were fuller in body (longer growing time leads to more sugar production and thus higher alcohol) and lower in acid (from prolonged heat exposure). These wines became very popular in America and throughout the world, so much so that California exports were often overshadowing more traditionalist European exports, so if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. Many European producers would pick their grapes later in the season so that there were lower levels of tannin and acid, thus appealing to the same palates that are buying up so much California wine.

But I’ve digressed long enough; it’s time to return to the matter at hand: En Fuego Tempranillo. My first reaction to the palate was “wow, that’s a lot of fruit,” followed shortly by “wow, that’s a lot of acidity!” But the two are relatively well-balanced, and that’s the key. The acid keeps the wine from tasting too “sweet” and “flabby,” while not making it taste sour. Also, there’s some spice in the wine but not as much as I was getting on the nose; it was more of a light accent than a more dominant character in the makeup. The wine had a relatively short finish, which I expected from the wine (it’s $12.00 on the shelf), but I didn’t expect myself to enjoy it as much as I did.

I had it for two meals: a roast chicken and a chulent. Between the two, the chulent was the better dish with the wine, though I do have to admit that I thought this wine showed best when drunk on its own. Not every wine is meant to be aged (this wine did not have the tannic structure to allow for graceful aging. The acid would fall out too quickly and not taste good after a few years, in all likelihood). If you did want to age this wine, it would probably last a year or two in a cellar, but that’s it. Not the 40+ years some other wines have as aging potential. But it wasn’t intended to do such things. The En Fuego was a simple, fun party wine. Maybe it would have gone better with some mild or nutty cheese, but I didn’t try that route (it’s Shabbos…gotta have meat!). All that being said, I’m a big fan of this bottle and woudl definitely buy again. Note: If you are considering this wine for a party, beware that it is NOT mevushal.

Dalton Reserve Sauvignon Blanc, Israel, 2009

July 10, 2011 Leave a comment

Welcome back, sports fans! Today we are looking at another Israeli wine. This time, from the Dalton winery, one of the larger wineries in the country. In particular, we are looking at their Reserve Sauvignon Blanc from 2009.

So what is all this “Reserve” business all about? The answer really varies, depending on which country whence your wine originates. For example, in most European countries, to have the word “reserve” (adjusted for whichever language your country speaks) on your label, you must age the wine for a longer period of time than your regular version of the same wine. Usually, this is 1-2 years beyond the base level. However, there is variation, again depending on your wine’s country of origin.

In Spain, for example, a “reserva” wine is aged for a minimum of 1 year in casks and a total of 3 years between cask and bottle aging; and the Spanish “Gran Reserva” is aged for a minimum of 5 years (2 in cask and 3 in bottle). Also, to make this even more confusing, the details of “reserva” and “Grand Reserva” labeling can vary from region to region.

In Italy, things can be just as confusing. For example, in the Taurasi region a regular wine must be aged a minimum of 3 years and “riserva” wines a minimum of 4 years; on the other hand, Chianti regular wines must be aged a minimum of 7 months and “riserva” Chianti a minimum of 27 months.

If that weren’t confusing enough, if you go into so-called “New World” wine regions (including Israel), there are no regulations regarding the use of the word “Reserve” on the label. The implication behind the word “reserve” is that it is indeed a better-quality wine than your regular bottle, but particularly in America, there is nothing prohibiting someone from putting a bunch of dreck in a bottle and labeling it “reserve.”

Now, on to Dalton’s Reserve Sauvignon Blanc. In this situation, because Dalton makes so many different levels of wine, Reserve actually does correctly imply a higher quality of wine from their lower levels of production. First, the wine comes from a handful of select vineyars (in this case, Safsufa, Merom Galil and Kerem Ben Zimra vineyards). They only use free-run juice (that is, only the juice that comes out of the crushing bin that is the result of grapes pressing down on others, without the assistance of manmade devices), which is regarded the world round as being rarer, and of higher quality. The wine was fermented in stainless steel tanks, which (remember our earlier posts?) means you’re going to get more purity of fruit out of the wine and not as much body and smoky/oaky/vanilla/etc. flavors in the wine.

The first time I had this wine was many years ago, when I was just learning about the kosher side of the wine world. I was blown away by the quality and complexity of the wine, when most of the kosher wines I had in the past were more basic and not all that interesting. It was a real treat to pick up this bottle and revisit it a few vintages later (also beware: it’s not always easy to find!).

The nose gave off aromas of citrus peel and fresh taragon; there was also a hint of gooseberry that came out after 24 hours of opening. The palate was very complex, and I know I didn’t get everything, but here goes. Preserved Lemons, steely mineral, lots of earthy herbs and a hint of toastiness (from the yeasts? Remember, there was no oak aging on this wine!). I had this straight out of my fridge (which is admittedly very cold!), and it was a disappointing showing, but after letting it warm up a bit (so word to the wise: don’t let it get ice cold; it gets too tart that way!), the herbal and more nuanced citrus notes come through.

I had this wine with my usual Shabbos roast chicken and chulent for lunch the next day; neither dish really worked but I could see huge potential for a delicate white-fleshed fish dish with this wine.

As a closing remark, another kosher wine blogger, Yossie Horwitz has been a huge inspiration of mine, and was part of the reason I wanted to get into this business myself. (And for the record, he did NOT ask me to do a plug for him.) It has been my hope to maintain his conversational style of wine writing while injecting some more technical information in my posts so that the consumer will ultimately have an understanding not only what a wine tastes like, but why it tastes like that. I highly recommend that readers of this blog also seek him out at or to follow him on Twitter @yossieuncorked

Gamla Reserve Merlot, Galilee

April 5, 2011 Leave a comment

So, despite Paul Giamatti’s tirade on Sideways I decided to give Merlot a chance. While I generally agree with his character’s stance on the grape (keep tuned!), there are always exceptions to the rule.

So why do wine geeks rag on Merlot so much? In general, there’s a very simple reason: a lack of balance. California Merlot has been an insanely popular wine from the 60s and 70s through today. Its popularity stems from the soft and plummy nature of the grape. Its tannins are generally lower than its Cabernet cousins and is a very approachable wine. By being so fruity and low in tannin, acid, etc., and yet full-bodied, Merlot is the kind of wine that many newbies to the wine world can easily pick up and enjoy. But this quality is a double-edged sword.

This lack of variance and lack of acid/tanin, due to a general tendency in Cali (and other areas) to allow the grape to overripen, leads to a wine that, while easily approachable and drinkable, is also very uninteresting and lacking dimension. In other terms, Merlot, the way it’s produced for mass market wines, is like listening to a person singing unaccompanied. While the singer’s music is likely more easily heard and understood, the lack of background musical movement leads to an overall uninteresting performance. As another image, think of how the Olympic sport of ice skating would change if there were no music for the skater(s) to perform to.

Earlier I mentioned over-ripening the grape. The school of thought in California (and many New World-style producers) is to let the grape ripen as long as possible on the vine. The resulting wine is going to be fuller in body and lower in acid. Robert Parker is one of the more famous wine critics whose palate has done nothing but wonders for the full-bodied, over-ripened, uber-fruity, heavily oaked wines.

In an attempt to make up for the lack of tannic structure in the wine, California winemakers will often age their Merlots in oak barrels for extended periods; this oak aging will allow the wine to leach tannin from the oak and give some of that structure that it so desperately needs. However, the downside to oak aging of this type is that the flavors and aromas that the wine gets from the oak also tend to overpower whatever flavors and aromas are extant in the wine itself.

In short, the overripe, fruity, oaky Merlot, while a wine that even the most rudimentary drinker can enjoy, often leaves the sophisticat wanting.

So, getting off my soap box and moving along….today’s specimen is an oak aged Merlot from Israel by Gamla. While not my favorite wine that I’ve ever tasted, it certainly has some redeeming factors that make it a wine that isn’t deserving of a carte blanche criticism of the Sideways persuasion.

Yes, it is oaky. You can tell this from the strong vanilla and smoky aromas that the wine gives off. (and yes, these qualities are echoed in the palate). but beyond that, you will find that there is some tobacco, woody spice and dark plum notes that lend the wine some interest. The last couple of days I’ve been drinking this wine with both roast chicken and chicken soup and it is probably not the best companion for those dishes, but at the same time not the worst, either.  I would like to try this wine with a dish centered around some merguez sausage or something else of that sort…maybe a Majadara or Tajine. Both of these dishes are round and relatively softly-flavored and allow for some interesting interaction on your palate with a wine such as this.

Categories: Uncategorized

Joseph River Cabernet-Merlot-Shiraz, Australia, 2009

March 28, 2011 Leave a comment

This was a recent acquisition at my store and was a real pleasant surprise. I’ve had 2 bottles of it over the last couple of weeks, if that gives you any indication of my overall thoughts on this wine. But let’s get down to brass tacks.

We’ve covered Australia before, and each of the grapes contained in the wine, so I’m going to forego my usual background spiel and discuss the wine itself.

Even though it’s a relatively inexpensive wine at $15, there’s a surprising level of acidity in the wine, which it needs. Australian Cabernet and Shiraz, when young, are so rich and decadent that they need some sort of acid to keep everything in balance, or else you have this fat round wine that is unable to do much for your palate because of its lack of balance.

The bouquet is inviting with notes of chocolate, raspberries and both green and black pepper. The palate showed that acidity on the forefront (perhaps they added some acidic element during the wine production?); while it wasn’t as well integrated as one would like, for a $15 wine, we can’t have everything. But beyond the acid there are lots of fresh berries a little of the tell-tale Shiraz spicy quality and an addictive oaky quality that many Australian wines are becoming known for.

This is becoming my go-to for an everyday wine that one could have on its own or with a rich fish (think salmon or tuna) that has a really strong sauce.

Categories: Uncategorized

Teal Lake Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon, 2004, Australia

February 20, 2011 Leave a comment

Teal Lake was the first and is perhaps the most famous of the Australian kosher wineries. Their standard offerings (at around $14/bottle) typify the Australian style of big, fruit-forward and very easily enjoyable.

Australian wines fall into the category of “New World” winemaking styles because of the emphasis on fruit in the wine and de-emphasizing the earthier and more rustic aspects of wines normally found in their European counterparts. Also, and more importantly, there is a lack of restrictions on winemaking in New World regions as compared to their “Old World” counterparts. In Europe, there is a system of appellation of origin (AOC in France, DO in Spain and Portugal, DOC/DOCG in Italy) that guarantees the consumer that the contents of a given bottle will have certain grapes, aging etc. In other words, in France to have the title “Appellation Bordeaux Controllee”) you must have a wine that is made up of predominantly Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Cabernet Franc, with some other grapes such as Petit Verdot, Malbec and Tannat allowed in the blend in small amounts. If you wanted to make a wine based on Pinot Noir in Bordeaux, you would not be allowed to have an AOC Bordeaux label on your wine. So not only does the appellation of origin guarantee the location of the wine’s production but also what is in the wine, etc.

If I wanted to make a Cabernet-based wine in Burgundy, for example, I would have to “declassify” my wine into a “lower” level of production, usually “Vin de Pays” (a translation of that phrase is “country wine”). Under Vin de Pays and lower classifications of wine, there is more freedom in the grapes used to make a given wine, but the wine maker is not allowed to use a more specific designation to describe the wine’s geographic origins. Furthermore, many Vin de Pays are restricted in the prices they can charge for said wine.

By contrast, New World wines don’t have these kinds of restrictions on their winemaking. While there is still some appellation control involved in the New World, its focus is primarily on the geography of the wine; it guarantees that your wine is from Napa Valley, and not, say from Sonoma or Oregon. But beyond those restrictions, there is not much the law says about the wines New World wine makers produce. They have the freedom to make wines from whatever grapes they want, in whatever proportions desired. As a wine maker I can use my vineyard to grow Cabernet Sauvignon (classically grown in warmer Bordeaux) but then if I want, I can rip out the vines and grow Pinot Noir (classically from cooler-climate Burgundy) in the same plot of land. I can age the wine as long as I want in whatever kind of container (from small oak barrels to massive stainless steel tanks) I should choose.

The most famous grape in the Australian vineyard is Shiraz, which most people don’t realize is the exact same grape as Syrah from the Rhone region of France. However, despite being the same grape, there are distinct differences between them that could justify the name change. Whereas French Syrah is typically earthy and spicy as its predominant characteristics, Australian wine makers typically emphasize the fruit flavors of the wine by allowing the grapes to mature until the last possible moment before picking. Furthermore, many Australian wine makers use new oak barrels and/or oak chips in older barrels to give their wines a more oaky flavor (you’d notice strong vanilla, buterscotch and smoky aromas/flavors in the wine).

Now, let’s turn our attention to the main character in today’s post: Teal Lake Cab Sauv Reserve 2004. I had this wine in January 2011 so the wine itself is 7 years old! That is an unusual marker for any modern-styled wine to be able to age that long, and it’s important to note that it has only been available on the market for a few months now, so it’s not a wine that just sat on shelves and no one bought. It was aged and then released at the winery’s discretion.

My tasting of this wine was a very confusing one because I was getting notes that I would have expected from an older wine while still getting some qualities that are typical for Australian wines. On the nose I smelled fresh jammy fruits right off. The fact that this quality was present at all, let alone the predominant aroma was quite confusing to me. When a wine ages, the fresh fruity qualities that are present in a younger wine disappear. For example, instead of fresh jammy plums in a young wine, one would get the essence of dried or preserved fruit (ie, prunes). However, in the Teal Lake 2004 I was able to distinctly smell the fresh cherries and blueberries in the wine. In the background there were some tell-tale earthy and musty qualities that are typical in older wines, which were pleasant in their own right.

On the palate these seemingly conflicting experiences continued. I tasted ripe strawberries initially but they gave way to green pepper and leathery notes with a relatively short finish. There was enough tannin to the wine that it has the potential to go with something like a burger (or something else on the barbie) but not enough acidity for me to call it  hearty food wine.  I think it is enjoyable on its own as a sipper in the middle of the day as a starter for a longer dinner.

Overall, despite the confusion this wine brought to my nose and palate, I thought it was a very intriguing wine that both confirmed and denied its age (can you do botox on a bottle of wine?). I would hope that some of my readers would buy a bottle themselves and tell me their thoughts on the bottle. It goes for around $20 on store shelves.


Categories: Uncategorized